NEWS CENTER

新闻中心

奥博资讯

媒体报道

体系论文

首页

The Origami Windmill Model: Theoretical Origin of the Two Foundational Research Tracks in Brain Science

发布时间：

2026-07-30

The Origami Windmill Model: Theoretical Origin of the Two Foundational Research Tracks in Brain Science

Sun Zuodong

Within the vast research landscape of brain science, bioelectrical mechanisms and genetic laws serve as the two cornerstones underpinning the entire discipline. For a long time, research in this field has advanced steadily under established paradigms. An academic evaluation system has gradually taken shape through professional title assessment, research project funding, journal publications and other mechanisms. While standardizing research order, it has also naturally formed a relatively stable structure of academic discourse.

The bioelectrical activity of nerve cells and the transmission of genetic information constitute the core pivot for decoding the operating logic of the brain. Mainstream research approaches are well-established, yet numerous critical mechanisms remain unresolved, including the precise regulation of transmembrane potential and the bioelectrical modification pathways of genetic information. Notably, conventional research often treats bioelectrical activity and genetic information transmission as two separate systems, lacking systematic investigations into their internal interaction mechanisms.

Based on the theoretical framework of cellular bioelectrogenetics, this paper conducts theoretical deductions using the potassium channel origami windmill model and adheres to a truth-seeking research approach. Starting from the dynamic characteristics of the membrane-nucleus electrical coupling delay effect — a measurable fixed time lag in the transmission of membrane potential signals to the cell nucleus — it sorts out the inherent logic of electromagnetic wave information transmission in neurons, whereby neural signals travel long distances across neural networks in the form of electromagnetic fields. It further establishes a closed theoretical loop linking bioelectrical activity and genetic modification. This research path is not merely an addendum to existing paradigms; instead, it seeks to bridge the internal connections between the two foundational fields, offering a new perspective for research on the fundamental mechanisms of brain science.

While academic influence standardizes research order, it cannot set boundaries for the pursuit of truth. Faced with established research frameworks, we neither deliberately conform to entrenched perceptions nor seek attention through online hype. Instead, we ground our work in fully consistent theoretical systems and verifiable scientific evidence. While respecting the research achievements of scholars from past generations, we reserve room for independent exploration and push forward the frontiers of fundamental research at the intersection of bioelectricity and genetics.

Many riddles still shroud the fundamental logic governing vital brain activities. Only by anchoring objective laws, upholding the rigorous, truth-seeking standards of scientific research, and engaging in equal academic dialogue backed by solid theoretical outcomes can we secure a firm foothold in brain science research.

A simple rule holds true across all industries: as long as clear-minded practitioners who uphold objective standards exist and are granted normal channels to voice their views, speculative, impetuous chaos divorced from core disciplinary pursuits will be kept in check. Scientific exploration abides by this same logic. Brain science still abounds with unsolved fundamental puzzles. Academic progress requires both reverence for the accumulated achievements of predecessors and space for independent critical thinking. Only by conducting in-depth original research rooted in objective laws and consistently amplifying rational, rigorous academic viewpoints can we sustain a tranquil, truth-oriented ecosystem for fundamental research.