NEWS CENTER

新闻中心

首页

Science and Religion Should Not Be Opposed but Engage in Dialogue——From Misinterpretation of the McLean Case to the Brain Electromagnetic Fingerprint: A Forty-Year-Overdue Breakthrough in Cognition

发布时间：

2026-06-05

Sun Zuodong

The 1981 McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education case in Arkansas, USA, stands as an iconic ruling in the modern history of relations between science and religion. Many simplify it as a triumph of science over religion, forming an entrenched mindset that the two are irreconcilable, bound to be separated and diametrically opposed.

Such an interpretation, though seemingly straightforward, is narrow-minded. Are science and religion destined to clash? The answer is no. Instead of confrontation and exclusion, they ought to communicate and complement each other.

The case itself is uncomplicated. The core dispute centered on whether public schools could incorporate religious content disguised as "creation science" into science curricula. The court’s final ruling drew a clear line between science education and religious belief, safeguarding the independence of science teaching, a rational and necessary verdict.

Troubles arose, however, from subsequent over-interpretation. The principle of separating religious preaching from classroom science teaching was unreasonably extrapolated into a total cognitive divide between science and religion. An artificial barrier thus came into being: any exploration by scientists into consciousness, the soul or ultimate questions of life is dismissed as slipping into metaphysics; any discussion by religionists on life experience and spiritual heritage is labeled anti-scientific.

This was never the original intent of the ruling, but a self-imposed confinement crafted by humankind. Science aims to decipher the world via empirical evidence, logical reasoning and verifiable methods, while religion delivers ultimate care for the meaning of life, spiritual belonging and moral order. One explores the laws of the material world outward, the other ponders existential meaning inward. As two wings of human civilization, they bear no inherent conflict.

What is more, science, philosophy and theology originated from the same source and diverged only in research approaches. Artificial division and opposition among them distort civilization and betray the pursuit of truth.

Throughout history, numerous preeminent scientists including Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Francis Crick and Chen Ning Yang inevitably contemplated cosmic order and ultimate existence when advancing to the cutting edge of their research. Such contemplation is not a descent into theology but a natural outgrowth of humanity’s innate desire for knowledge. To stigmatize or ban such inquiries amounts to mutilating the spirit of science.

Science does not culminate in metaphysics but leads into deeper realms of the unknown; religion is rooted not in superstition but in humanity’s yearning for eternity and existential meaning. The rightful bond between them lies in dialogue rather than hostility, complementarity instead of mutual rejection.

For the past four decades, humankind has paid a steep price for this artificially manufactured opposition. Despite booming advances in brain science, researchers hesitate to delve into the essence of consciousness; as life science gains unprecedented precision, scholars shy away from studies on trans-temporal transmission of memory and information. A host of well-documented life phenomena such as near-death experiences, unique sensory perceptions and cross-individual memory are casually branded superstition and denied rigorous scientific scrutiny merely due to their superficial links to traditional beliefs.

Such practice hinders rather than advances scientific progress through self-imposed restrictions. Against this backdrop, we put forward the theoretical framework of the Brain Electromagnetic Fingerprint. The framework neither seeks to validate religion nor criticize faith; instead, it builds a rational platform for dialogue between science and the humanities.

Based on the original origami windmill model of potassium ion channels, combined with electromagnetism and neurodynamics, we propose a series of testable and falsifiable scientific hypotheses: neuronal activities generate unique extremely low-frequency electromagnetic signals forming individual-specific brain electromagnetic fingerprints; these signals decay slowly and provide a physical foundation for information preservation and transmission; consciousness, memory and personality traits may be encoded and transmitted in the form of electromagnetic field patterns; numerous seemingly mysterious life phenomena can potentially be explained by rigorous, experimentally verifiable physical mechanisms.

We hold firm to this stance: science answers what things are, why they exist and how they operate, while faith consoles the soul, endows life with meaning and guides moral conduct. Mutual respect and communication between the two, each performing its respective function, complete human civilization.

Forcing science and religion onto opposing sides is short-sighted; dismissing one in favor of the other is bigoted; avoiding ultimate existential questions out of self-censorship betrays human curiosity.

Publishing this article clarifies prevalent misreadings of the McLean case and heralds a cognitive breakthrough for the future: science has no forbidden research zones, and exploration knows no bounds. Science and religion are non-antagonistic and should engage in dialogue. Free from self-restraint and conservatism, science can stay committed to truth-seeking and faith to promoting goodness, enabling humanity to forge ahead steadily toward unveiling the secrets of life and the cosmos.